Decision-making in the production chain of a firm based on a dynamic planning model with backward recursion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/r3ckp302Keywords:
dynamic production decision-making, uncertainty management, dynamic planning models.Abstract
The inspection of spare parts and finished products in the current production process is often difficult to adapt to the requirements of a variety of production scenarios, in order to meet the minimization of production costs in a variety of production scenarios, this paper takes six production scenarios as an example, in order to achieve the optimization goal of minimizing the cost of enterprise production, the use of the dynamic programming model for the four phases of the enterprise's production of the inverse recursive solution for enterprise production. This paper explores the necessity of testing both individual components and finished products, as well as the practicality of dismantling nonconforming products at various stages of the production process under different conditions. It further examines whether defective products should undergo disassembly at each phase of production and assesses if testing components and final outputs, along with handling defects through disassembly, should be conducted differently depending on specific circumstances.
Downloads
References
[1] Davide Settembre-Blundo, Rocío González-Sánchez, Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García Muiña. Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times [J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2021, 22 (3): 107–132.
[2] Anna Diaz, Josef-Peter Schöggl, Tatiana Reyes, Rupert J. Baumgartner. Sustainable product development in a circular economy: Implications for products, actors, decision-making support and lifecycle information management [J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 26 (4): 1031-1045.
[3] Adriane MacDonald, Amelia Clarke & Lei Huang. Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainability: Designing Decision-Making Processes for Partnership Capacity [J]. Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology, 2022, 10 (11): 103-120.
[4] Waqar Ahmed. Analyzing the impact of environmental collaboration among supply chain stakeholders on a firm’s sustainable performance [J]. Operations Management Research, 2020, 13 (2): 4-21.
[5] Güven Demirel, Bart L. MacCarthy et al. Identifying dynamical instabilities in supply networks using generalized modeling [J]. Supply Chain Management Review, 2019, 65 (2): 136-159.
[6] Wantao Yu, Mark A. Jacobs, Roberto Chavez, Jiehui Yang. Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective [J] International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 218: 352-362.
[7] David J. Teece. Business models and dynamic capabilities [J]. Long Range Planning, 2018, 51 (1): 40-49.
[8] Nancy M.P. Bocken, Thijs H.J. Geradts. Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities [J]. Long Range Planning, 2020, 53 (4): 101950
[9] Alec Levenson, Alexis Fink. Human capital analytics: too much data and analysis, not enough models and business insights [J]. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2017, 4 (2): 92-101.
[10] Shauhin A. Talesh. Data Breach, Privacy, and Cyber Insurance: How Insurance Companies Act as“Compliance Managers”for Businesses [J]. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 43 (2): 417-440.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







