Optimization of Reliability Testing and Multi-stage Production Quality Control Based on Binomial Sequential Testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/wrc8gs97Keywords:
Binomial Sequential Testing Model, Multi-stage production quality control optimization model, Dynamic programming, Linear programming.Abstract
In modern manufacturing, enterprises are in urgent need of an optimized inspection solution that can guarantee product quality while reducing the sample size and cost for inspection, to address the challenges posed by high costs and strict reliability requirements. This study commences from multiple scenarios of finished product processing and component assembly procedures, based on the decision-making issues during the enterprise production process. A binomial sequential inspection model is established to obtain a suitable sampling inspection plan under binomial sequential inspection: When the confidence level is 95%, the maximum sample size is 6,355, and only 489 components must be inspected. If the defect rate significantly exceeds 10%, this batch of components will be rejected. When the confidence level is 90%, the maximum sample size is 5,293, and only 260 components must be inspected. If the defect rate does not exceed 10%, this batch of components will be accepted. Additionally, models such as the multi-stage production quality control optimization model based on dynamic programming and linear programming, and the multi-process decision optimization model have been established for systematic decision-making.
Downloads
References
[1] Cho, T.J., and Rhee, M.S. Health Functionality and Quality Control of Laver (Porphyra, Pyropia): Current Issues and Future Perspectives as an Edible Seaweed [J]. Marine Drugs, 2020, 18(1): 14.
[2] Zhou Shengze, Ren Yan, Ni Yiqiang, Xie Shenkun, and Li Yinle. Current situation and Prospect of Reliability Evaluation of Automotive Electronic Components [J]. Electronic Products Reliability and Environmental Test, 2024, 42 (02): 113-116.
[3] He Yangfen, and Zhang Yan. Electronic Components Testing Design to Improve the Reliability of Electronic Components [J]. Electronic Manufacturing, 2024, 32 (06): 109-111.
[4] Li Shouchang. Analysis of key points and problems in the use of modern precision instruments [J]. Modern Agriculture, 2020, 02:64-66.
[5] LV Shuyang, Zheng Kai, Zhao Yingnan, and Li Fuhai. Application of carbon fiber reinforced composites in aerospace field [J]. Polyester Industry, 2024, 37 (03): 71-73.
[6] LI Weiping, RAO Han, LIU Hui-cong, LI Min, XIAO Wenlong, Ru Yi, and Chen Haining. Exploration and practice of ideological and political construction of Aerospace Structural materials curriculum [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2024, 10 (22): 60-62+67.
[7] Wen Jun, and Wang Ya. Aerospace translation studies: Objects, types and values [J]. Shanghai Translation, 2024, 03 : 20-24.
[8] Zhang Yulong. Maintenance and Fault diagnosis of Medical equipment [J]. China Medical Device Information, 2024, 30 (16): 158-160+170.
[9] Yu Qinglin, and Xiang Yu. Research on cost prediction method of medical device R&D based on Monte Carlo simulation [J]. Healthcare Equipment, 2024, 45 (08): 78-82.
[10] Fallahnezhad, M.S., Rasay, H., Darbeh, J., and Nakhaeinejad, M. Economic Single-Sampling Plans Based on Different Probability Distributions Considering Inspection Errors [J]. Journal of Quality Engineering and Production Optimization, 2020, 5 (1): 55-64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







