ESG Rating Divergence and Financing Constraints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jfyc7n41Keywords:
Financing Constraints, ESG Rating, ESG Rating Divergence, Information Asymmetry, Operating Risks.Abstract
The ESG ratings provided by ESG rating agencies become an significant reference for decision-making by investors or creditors. However, the ESG rating divergence not only brings noise to the capital market but also exacerbates corporate financing constraints. The article takes Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2022 as the sample and uses the fixed effects model to empirically test the impact of ESG rating divergence on corporate financing constraints. The study finds that: ESG rating divergence increases corporate financing constraints. Further research reveals that: ESG rating divergence intensifies market information asymmetry and business operating risks, thereby increasing corporate financing constraints; in non-state-owned enterprises and enterprises with high-quality accounting information disclosure, it exacerbates the impact of ESG rating divergence on financing constraints. This study provides evidence for regulating the construction of the ESG rating system and reducing corporate financing constraints.
Downloads
References
[1] Berg F, Kölbel J F, Rigobon R. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings [J]. Review of Finance, 2022, 26 (6): 1315-1344.
[2] Chatterji A K, Durand R, Levine D I, et al. Do ratings of firms converge?Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37 (8): 1597-1614.
[3] Kotsantonis S, Serafeim G. Four things no one will tell you about ESG data [J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2019, 31 (2): 50-58.
[4] Dimson E, Marsh P, Staunton M. Divergent ESG ratings [J]. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2020, 47 (1): 75−87.
[5] Billio M, Costola M, Hristova I, et al. Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis) agreement and performance [J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2021, 28 (5): 1426−1445.
[6] Abhayawansa S, Tyagi S. Sustainable investing: The black box of environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings [J]. The Journal of Wealth Management, 2021, 24 (1): 49−54.
[7] Mi Rui. Analyst coverage, accounting information comparability, and financial constraints [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2023, 44 (09) : 82-89
[8] Avramov D, Cheng S, Lioui A, et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, 145 (2): 642-664.
[9] KAPLAN S N, ZINGALES L. Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112 (1) : 169-215
[10] Gibson B.R., Krueger P., Schmidt P.S. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns [J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2021, 77 (4): 104-27.
[11] Ma Wenjie, Yu Bojian. Corporate ownership attributes and differences between Chinese and foreign ESG ratings [J]. Finance and Economics Research Institute, 2023 (06): 124-136.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







