The Effect of Digital Inclusive Finance on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from Chinese A-listed Shares
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/rnmzzz31Keywords:
Digital Inclusive Finance; ESG; Listed Companies; Corporate Performance; Sustainability.Abstract
Digital Inclusive Finance (DIF) is a controversial policy. It can facilitate business startups, provide security and transparency, enhance social inclusion and equality, and foster economic development. Still, it may also result in a debt trap for borrowers and elevated financial risks for creditors. Examining its effects thus seems critical for policymakers. Many previous studies have examined the impact of DIF on corporate environmental social governance (ESG) performance; however, their heterogeneity and mechanism tests are not comprehensive enough to provide thorough policy recommendations. After giving theoretical proof of the causality between DIF and ESG, the study empirically finds a positive correlation between the local DIF index and corporate ESG ratings by exploiting data from publicly listed companies from 2011 to 2020, and it passes several endogeneity and robustness tests. Heterogeneity tests suggest that the relationship is especially significant for larger-sized publicly owned primary sector firms in less economically developed regions regarding their social performance index. Mechanism tests suggest mediating variables of enhanced executive's green attention, reduced carbon emission, increased government subsidy, improved information disclosure, reduced capital misallocation, and financial constraints. These results contribute to policymakers' decision-making for a more efficient DIF development process to facilitate ESG improvements.
Downloads
References
[1] Elkington, John. 1998. "Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line." Measuring Business Excellence 2 (3): 1-6.
[2] Wen, Huwei, Weitao Liang, and Chien-Chiang Lee. 2023. "China's Progress toward Sustainable Development in Pursuit of Carbon Neutrality: Regional Differences and Dynamic Evolution." Environmental Impact Assessment Review98 (January): 106959.
[3] Watkins, Latham. 2024. "China's Ministry of Finance Publishes Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards." Environment, Land & Resources. July 5, 2024.
[4] Phan, Michelle. 2021. "ESG Challenges and Opportunities in Chinese Equities - Cambridge Associates." Cambridge Associates. September 3, 2021.
[5] Baker, Brian. 2023. "ESG Investing Statistics 2023." Bankrate. Bankrate.com. January 31, 2023.
[6] Tay, Lee-Ying, Hen-Toong Tai, and Gek-Siang Tan. 2022. "Digital Financial Inclusion: A Gateway to Sustainable Development."Heliyon8 (6): e09766-66.
[7] Zairis, Georgios, Panagiotis Liargovas, and Nikolaos Apostolopoulos. 2024. "Sustainable Finance and ESG Importance: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda" Sustainability 16, no. 7: 2878.
[8] Li, Wenqi, and Wenbin Pang. 2023. "The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Corporate ESG Performance: Based on the Perspective of Corporate Green Technology Innovation." Environmental Science and Pollution Research30 (24): 65314-27.
[9] Wang, Fangjun, Xinmiao Zhou, and Tian Gan. 2024. "Can Green Funds Improve Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance? Evidence from Chinese-Listed Companies."PLoS ONE19 (3): e0301395-95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.