Research on Willingness to Pay for Cascade Utilization of New Energy Vehicle Battery Products under the “Double Carbon” Goal

Authors

  • Pengyu Dai
  • Qian Xu
  • Huaming Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/7vzbk729

Keywords:

“Double Carbon” Goal; New Energy; Secondary Utilization; Willingness to pay.

Abstract

With the growing global concern about climate change, China, as the world's largest carbon emitter, faces the great challenge of achieving the carbon peak and carbon neutral goals. This paper explores the factors affecting consumers' willingness to pay for secondary utilization of battery products and, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), adds three variables, namely incentive policy, knowledge and perceived risk, and applies interpretative structural modeling (ISM) to analyze how these factors affect consumers' willingness to pay. It was found that knowledge and incentive policy are deep-level factors that affect willingness to pay, while consumers' perceived risk, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms are mid-level influences that directly affect attitude and willingness to pay. Attitude, as a superficial factor, is a direct determinant of consumers' willingness to pay. Through ISM analysis, the study reveals the interactions and the dynamic circular system between these factors, emphasizing the importance of policy and knowledge dissemination in promoting consumer acceptance of new products, as well as the importance of reducing perceived risk and increasing self-efficacy in forming positive attitudes. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed and relevant policy recommendations are made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] WANG Z P, ZHAN W P, SUN F C, et al. Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction Potential of New Energy Vehicles[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, Nature Edition, 2024,44(2): 111-122

[2] Li J L, Wang Z, Xu D Z, et al. Comparative Analysis of Policies Related to the Stepwise Utilization of Retired Power Batteries[J]. Modern Electric Power, 2021, 38(3): 316-324

[3] Interim measures for the Management of Recycling and Utilization of Power Battery for New Energy Vehicles[EB / OL]. [2019-11-06]. http: / / www. gov. cn / xinwen / 2018-02 / 26 / content_52688 75. htm

[4] LIU Q, CHEN X C, WU J X, et al. Current Situation and Comprehensive Analysis of Decommissioned Power Battery Trapezoidal Utilization under the Goal of “Double Carbon”[J]. Renewable Resources and Circular Economy,2024,17(1):24-31

[5] Zhang H, Huang J, Hu R, et al. Echelon Utilization of Waste Power Batteries in New Energy Vehicles: Review of Chinese Policies[J]. Energy, 2020, 206:118178

[6] WANG K Q, ZHOU L, PENG Q, et al. A Review of Recycling Technologies for the Secondary Utilization of Retired Lithium-ion Power Batteries[J]. Electronic Quality,2023(6):109-113.

[7] HUANG J Z, ZENG G S, LIU C L, et al. Policies, Challenges and Research Progress on the Secondary Utilization of Retired Lithium-ion Power Batteries[J]. Journal of Nanchang University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Natural Science Edition),2023,37(3):1-11

[8] LIU Q, CHEN X C, WU J X, et al. Current Situation and Comprehensive Analysis of the Stepwise Utilization of Retired Power Batteries under the Goal of “Double Carbon”[J]. Renewable Resources and Circular Economy,2024,17(1):24-31

[9] Rautela R, Yadav B R, Kumar S. A review on technologies for recovery of metals from waste lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2023, 580: 233428

[10] Garg A, Wang N, Su S, et al. Echelon utilization of retired power lithium-ion batteries: Challenges and prospects[J]. Batteries, 2022, 8(8): 96-96

[11] Ahmadi L, Young S B, Fowler M, et al. A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22: 111-124

[12] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991,50(2):179–211

[13] Stern P. C. Information, Incentives, and Pro-environmental Consumer Behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 1999,22(4):461-478

[14] Lin B Q., Lan T X. Progress of increasing-block electricity pricing policy implementation in China's first-tier cities and the impact of resident policy perception[J].Energy Policy,2023,177:113544

[15] TANG W D, YU S T, WANG J H, et al. Research on the Mechanism Influencing Residents' Willingness to Pay for New Energy Vehicles in Shandong Province[J]. China Collective Economy,2024(2):54-57.

[16] Kang M., Young J. Augmented Reality and Motion Capture Apparel E-shopping Values and Usage Intention[J]. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology,2014,26(6),486–499

[17] Ma T, Shi L, Yue Y L, et al. Analysis of Strategic Goal System Structure and Influence Mechanism of Provincial Power Grid Companies[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2019,38(2):15-21

[18] Chen W H, Chang Z P. Analysis of Deep-seated Causes of Rural Household Poverty under the Perspective of Rural Revitalization - Based on MTS and ISM-SEM Models[J]. Mathematical Statistics and Management, 2020,39(6):1087-1104

[19] YUAN H P, SHU L L, DU W B, et al. Research on the Influencing Factors of Intelligent Operation and Maintenance Management of Infrastructure Based on ISM[J]. Journal of Engineering Management,2023,37(3):36-41

[20] Adu-Gyamfi G., Song H M., Nketiah E., et al. Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles[J]. Energy, 2022, 251

[21] Nautiyal S., Lal C. Product knowledge as a facilitator of organic purchase intention in emerging markets: Empirical evidence from India[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 372

[22] Ekow V. A. Unravelling electricity theft whistleblowing antecedents using the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model[J].Energy Policy,2022,160:112680

Downloads

Published

21-09-2025

How to Cite

Dai, P., Xu, Q., & Song, H. (2025). Research on Willingness to Pay for Cascade Utilization of New Energy Vehicle Battery Products under the “Double Carbon” Goal. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 63, 286-296. https://doi.org/10.54097/7vzbk729