Research On the Progress Countermeasures of Finance of Green Under the Goal of Carbon Neutrality

Authors

  • Minzhe Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/vq8p3403

Keywords:

Finance of green; Carbon Neutrality; Sustainable progress.

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasingly severe global environmental issues, environmental changes have posed a serious threat to human society and even become the greatest challenge to human progress. To address climate change, countries around the world are working together. During its progress, China has always adhered to the concept of green progress, actively promoted the construction of ecological civilization, and to address environmental change issues, China has proposed the goals of "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality", practiced the concept that "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets", and implemented sustainable progress policies. From another perspective, this demonstrates China's responsibility as a major responsible country in fulfilling international responsibilities and promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind. This paper comprehensively analyzes the important role of finance of green in promoting the process of carbon neutrality and proposes a series of practical suggestions to provide useful references for promoting the healthy and rapid progress of finance of green and achieving the goal of carbon neutrality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jiang, X. L., and Zhang, Q. B. (2017). Theory and practice review of green finance for developed country. China. Popul. Resour. Environ. 27, 323–326. [Chinese].

[2] Kong, F. (2022). A better understanding of the role of new energy and green finance to help achieve carbon neutrality goals, with special reference to China. Sci. Progress-Uk 105 (1), 003685042210863. doi:10.1177/00368504221086361

[3] Li, X. P., Zhang, Y. J., and Jiang, F. T. (2019). Green industrial policy: Theory evolution and Chinese practice. J. Financ. Econ. 45 (08), 4–27. doi: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.08.001

[4] Islam, M. J., Roy, S. K., Miah, M., and Das, S. K. (2020). A review on corporate environmental reporting (CER): An emerging issue in the corporate world. Can. J. Bus. Inf. Stud. 2 (3), 45–53. doi:10.34104/cjbis.020.045053

[5] Lin, Y., Anser, M. K., Peng, M. Y. P., and Irfan, M. (2022). Assessment of renewable energy, financial growth and in accomplishing targets of China's cities carbon neutrality. Renew. Energy 205, 1082–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.026

[6] Hu, M., Deng, C., and Tang, Y. (2017). Study on green financial support for the development of resource-economical and environment-friendly industry. Econ. Geogr. 34, 107–111. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2014.11.017

[7] Gurol, J., and Starkmann, A. (2021). New partners for the planet? The European union and China in international climate governance from a role-theoretical perspective. Jcms-J. Common. Mark. S. 59 (3), 518–534. doi:10.1111/jcms.13098

[8] Lee, C. C., Li, X., Yu, C. H., and Zhao, J. (2022). The contribution of climate finance toward environmental sustainability: New global evidence. Energy Econ. 111, 106072. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106072

[9] Larsen, M. L. (2022). Driving global convergence in green financial policies: China as policy pioneer and the EU as standard setter. Glob. Policy. 13 (3), 358–370. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13105

[10] Lawrence, R. F., and Thomas, W. L. (2004). The equator principles and project finance: Sustainability in practice. Nat. Resour. Environ. 19 (2), 20–26. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40924560

[11] Li, X. X. (2020). Chilean minister of energy: I look forward to the in-depth expansion of energy cooperation between Chile and China. People's Dly.

[12] Ma, J. (2018). Green financial system construction and development opportunities. J. Financial Dev. Res. 1, 10–14.

Downloads

Published

03-03-2025

How to Cite

Chen, M. (2025). Research On the Progress Countermeasures of Finance of Green Under the Goal of Carbon Neutrality. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 48, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.54097/vq8p3403