Artificial Intelligence, A New Engine for ESG Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zzbe9583Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; ESG; Digital Infrastructure; Corporate Operations.Abstract
In the past decade, AI has become a major catalyst for enhancing corporate ESG performance and realizing social value. Drawing on data from Chinese A-share listed companies (2010–2022) and theories like resource-based view, information processing, and internal control, this study examines how AI application boosts ESG outcomes. The findings show that AI substantially improves ESG performance, especially in companies with stronger digital infrastructure and operational capabilities. Heterogeneity analysis indicates AI most significantly elevates social responsibility (S), followed by governance (G), while its effect on environmental (E) performance is weaker. The impact is also more pronounced in non-manufacturing and private enterprises. These results offer guidance for companies integrating AI into ESG strategies and for policymakers seeking to align AI initiatives with sustainable development goals and differentiated policies.
Downloads
References
[1] References (sorted by alphabetical order and Chinese articles are listed behind)
[2] Arminen, H., Puumalainen, K., Pätari, S., Fellnhofer, K., 2017. Corporate social performance: inter-industry and international differences. J. Clean. Prod., 177(3), 426–437.
[3] Attig, N., Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., 2016. Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics, 134(2), 171–197.
[4] Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
[5] Beji, R., Loukil, N., 2021. Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: empirical evidence from France. J. Bus. Ethics, 173(1), 133–155.
[6] Cai, Y., Pan, C.H., Statman, M., 2016. Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? J. Corp. Finance, 41(C), 591–609.
[7] Cassely, L., Larbi, S., Revelli, C., Lacroux, A., 2021. Corporate social performance (CSP) in times of economic crisis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(5), 913–942.
[8] Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C., 2012. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
[9] Chevrollier, N., Zhang, J., Nijhof, A., 2019. The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over time. Corp. Govern., 20(1), 123–142.
[10] Crace, L., Gehman, J., 2022. What really explains ESG performance? Disentangling the asymmetrical drivers of the triple bottom line. Organ. Environ., 36(1), 150–178.
[11] Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R., 2018. Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116.
[12] Drempetic, S., Klein, C., Zwergel, B., 2020. The influence of firm size on the ESG score: corporate sustainability ratings under review. J. Bus. Ethics, 167(2), 333–360.
[13] Foo Nin, H., Hui-Ming Deanna, W., Scott, J.V., 2012. A global analysis of corporate social performance: the effects of cultural and geographic environments. J. Bus. Ethics, 107(4), 423–433.
[14] Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A., 2015. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
[15] Galbraith, J. R., 1974. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36.
[16] Garcia, A., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., Orsato, R., 2017. Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: evidence from emerging markets. J. Clean. Prod., 150(1137), 135–147.
[17] Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J.M., Ravenda, D., 2019. Exploring the relationship between CEO characteristics and performance. J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 20(6), 1064–1082.
[18] Jang, G.-Y., Kang, H.-G., Kim, W., 2022. Corporate executives’ incentives and ESG performance. Finance Res. Lett., 49.
[19] Kotler, P., & Lee, N., 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Wiley.
[20] Maniora, J., 2015. Is integrated reporting really the superior mechanism for the integration of ethics into the core business model? An empirical analysis. J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 755–786.
[21] Martiny, A., Taglialatela, J., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F., 2024. Determinants of environmental social and governance (ESG) performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 456, 142213.
[22] May, R. L., 1993. COSO - internal control: Committee of sponsoring organizations of the treadway commission. Management Accounting, 74(9), 60.
[23] Mervelskemper, L., Streit, D., 2017. Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: is integrated reporting keeping its promise? Bus. Strat. Environ., 26(4), 536–549.
[24] Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., Mamode Khan, N., 2022. The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 953–985.
[25] Short, J.C., McKenny, A.F., Ketchen, D.J., Snow, C.C., Hult, G.T., 2015. An empirical examination of firm, industry, and temporal effects on corporate social performance. Bus. Soc., 55(8).
[26] [25] Shu, H., Tan, W., 2023. Does carbon control policy risk affect corporate ESG performance? Econ. Modell., 120.
[27] Teece, D. J., 1986. Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.
[28] Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
[29] Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M., 1990. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books.
[30] Umar, Z., Kenourgios, D., Papathanasiou, S., 2020. The static and dynamic connectedness of environmental, social, and governance investments: international evidence. Econ. Modell., 93, 112–124.
[31] Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E., 2013. Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: A revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77-84.
[32] Wang, L., Le, Q., Peng, M., Zeng, H., Kong, L., 2022. Does central environmental protection inspection improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance? Evidence from China. Bus. Strat. Environ., 1–23.
[33] Yan, Y., Cheng, Q., Huang, M., Lin, Q., Lin, W., 2023. Government environmental regulation and corporate ESG performance: evidence from natural resource accountability audits in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 20(1).
[34] Che Xiaoli & Hu Qingyu. (2024). A Brief Discussion on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the ESG Ratings of Listed Companies. Commercial Exhibition Economy (15), 138-141.
[35] Dai Zhixiang. (2024). Supplier Management Strategies Under Supply Chain Digital Transformation. Market Modernization (20), 60-62.
[36] Gao Linyan. (2025). Research on Innovative Strategies for Corporate Financial Management Based on Artificial Intelligence. Bohai Economic Outlook (01), 95-97.
[37] Han Yonggang. (2024). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Management. China Logistics and Purchasing (14), 101-102.
[38] Huang Dong. (2024). ESG Investment Combined with AI Technology. China Finance (17), 56-58.
[39] Lu Yue, Ma Minghui, Chen Yongchang & Zhang Haotian. (2023). Empowering Green Development with Artificial Intelligence. China Population, Resources and Environment (10), 100-111.
[40] Sun Bei. (2023). Analysis of Operational Capability of Listed Companies: A Case Study of Midea Group. Accountant (18), 25-28.
[41] Sun Wenyuan & Liu Yushan. (2023). Research on the Mechanism of Artificial Intelligence's Impact on the Labor Market. East China Economic Management (03), 1-9.
[42] Tong Jian. (2024). Research on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technology Applications on Financial Industry ESG Performance (Master’s Thesis, Anhui University of Finance and Economics). Master’s
[43] Wu Fei & Xu Siyang. (2022). Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology and Market Value of Listed Companies. Modern Economic Exploration (11), 77-92.
[44] Xu Jiayun, Shen Hanyu & Zhou Xinbo. (2024). Development of Artificial Intelligence and Corporate ESG Performance. World Economy Research (09), 120-134+137.
[45] Xu Xiaodan & Hui Ning. (2024). Research on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Green and Low-Carbon Development of Industry. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) (06), 74-86.
[46] Yao Jiaquan, Zhang Kunpeng, Guo Lipeng & Feng Xu. (2024). How Can Artificial Intelligence Enhance Corporate Production Efficiency? — From the Perspective of Adjusting Labor Skill Structure. Management World (02), 101-116+133+117-122.
[47] Zhang Wei. (2025). Research on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Audit Work. Time-Honored Brand Marketing (02), 52-54.
[48] Zhang Xuan, Li Zijian, Li Chuntao. (2019). Banking Competition, Financing Constraints, and Corporate Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Industrial Enterprises. Financial Research (10), 98-116.
[49] Zhong Juan, Ding Yifan, Lin Zi'ang & Wei Yanjie. Application of Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Customer Diversification: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on AI Innovative Application Pilot Areas. Foreign Economy and Management, 1-20.
[50] Zhu Li & Jiang Wenqi. (2024). Artificial Intelligence, ESG Performance, and Corporate Green Governance Level. Technology Economics and Management Research (12), 71-76.
[51] Zhu Siwei, Liang Ran & Lu Kangjuan. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Digital Responsibility on Corporate Social Performance: Evidence Based on the ESG Performance of Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Xi'an University of Finance and Economics (06), 64-79.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
