Research On the Influence Mechanism of Digital Infrastructure on Urban Environmental Governance Efficiency Based on Panel Data

Authors

  • Enyuan Shang
  • XinHao Jian
  • Lunwu Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jj240v37

Keywords:

Digital Infrastructure; Environmental Governance Efficiency; Mediation Effect; Moderating Effect.

Abstract

Under the dual background of high-quality development and ecological civilization construction, digital infrastructure development and environmental governance efficiency improvement have become critical issues in China's economic and social development. This study employs panel data from 235 Chinese cities to empirically verify the significant positive impact of digital infrastructure on environmental governance efficiency. The findings reveal that technological innovation and public ecological awareness function as mediating effects, while industrial upgrading plays a moderating role. Notably, this positive influence demonstrates heterogeneity, being less pronounced in economically developed cities compared to underdeveloped regions, and weaker in environmentally focused cities than in non-environmentally focused ones. The research innovatively illuminates the mechanisms and heterogeneous characteristics through which digital infrastructure affects environmental governance efficiency, thereby providing valuable theoretical foundations and policy implications for enhancing environmental governance practices in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Lu Haiyong, Song Pei, Li Lin, etc Integration of Digital Infrastructure and Domestic Market: Implications for Accelerating the Construction of a Unified Large Domestic Market [J]. Southern Economy, 2023 (12): 128-142

[2] Dong Yuanxiang, Zhang Guozhen Can the construction of digital infrastructure drive the carbon reduction and green transformation of enterprises—— Based on the chain network system of production factors [J]. Economic Issues, 2023 (06): 50-56

[3] Xu Xinyue Research on the Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Urban Environmental Governance in Henan Province from the Perspective of Economic Growth: Based on Combination Measurement and Random Effects Tobit Model [J]. Green Finance and Accounting, 2022 (08): 15-18

[4] Kang Yanxin, Lin Qianhan Efficiency evaluation and influencing factors of provincial environmental governance in China: based on entropy weight method and DEA unexpected output model [J]. Strait Science, 2023 (08): 45-54

[5] Luo Ming, Fan Ruguo, Zhang Yingqing Measurement and Evolution Analysis of Efficiency in Environmental and Social Governance in China [J]. Statistics and Decision making, 2021, 37 (09): 46-51

[6] Liang Tian, Chen Zhong Efficiency measurement, regional differences, and convergence characteristics analysis of ecological environment governance in China [J]. Statistics and Decision making, 2024, 40 (07): 93-97

[7] Lü Dan Does the construction of digital infrastructure affect the ESG performance of enterprises—— Empirical analysis from the quasi-natural experiment of the "Broadband China" strategy [J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2024, 44 (12): 3793-3810

[8] Wang Baoqian, Xu Rui Efficiency evaluation and influencing factors of carbon emission reduction system promoted by technological innovation [J]. Industrial Technology and Economics, 2022, 41 (05): 29-35

[9] Chen Fuyong, Meng Yan Development of Digital Economy, Environmental Awareness, and Corporate Green Investment: A Multi-Agent Perspective Analysis [J]. Economic Issues, 2024 (08): 60-68

[10] Peng Wenbin, Su Xinyi the Impact of Digital Economy Development on Carbon Emission Efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta Region: Threshold Effect Based on Industrial Agglomeration [J]. Contemporary Finance and Economics, 2024 (12): 126-139

Downloads

Published

07-07-2025

How to Cite

Shang, E., Jian, X., & Liu, L. (2025). Research On the Influence Mechanism of Digital Infrastructure on Urban Environmental Governance Efficiency Based on Panel Data. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 57, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.54097/jj240v37