Study on the Selection of International Wildlife Trade Partners Based on TOPSIS and Spatial Statistics

Authors

  • Ke Xu
  • Jingfu Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/1bqa5891

Keywords:

Illegal Wildlife Trade, International Collaboration, Topsis Model, Spatial Statistical Analysis.

Abstract

Illegal wildlife trade has become one of the primary threats to global biodiversity conservation, as the exploitation of natural resources not only disrupts ecological balance but also profoundly impacts the economic and social structures of multiple countries. To effectively curb this cross-border issue, countries have intensified international collaboration and protective measures. In this context, this study combines the TOPSIS evaluation model and spatial statistical analysis to scientifically assess the collaboration potential of international organizations and examine the spatial patterns of global illegal wildlife trade. Using the TOPSIS model, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) emerged as the ideal partner, with its expertise and resource support significantly enhancing project efficacy. Additionally, Moran's I algorithm was applied to analyze trade activities across 20 countries, revealing geographical clustering and interdependence between neighboring countries in illegal trade. This research offers a data-driven framework for collaboration and precise spatial intervention strategies to address the global wildlife trade crisis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] MOZER A, PROST S. An introduction to illegal wildlife trade and its effects on biodiversity and society[J]. Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments, 2023,3: 100064.

[2] ESMAIL N, WINTLE BC, T SAS ROLFES M, et al. Emerging illegal wildlife trade issues: A global horizon scan[J]. Conservation Letters, 2020,13(4): e12715.

[3] MONDAL S, PALIT D. Challenges in natural resource management for ecological sustainability[M]//Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability. Elsevier, 2022:29-59.

[4] LEGRAND T, LEUPRECHT C. Securing cross-border collaboration: transgovernmental enforcement networks, organized crime and illicit international political economy[J]. Policy and Society, 2021,40(4): 565-586.

[5] BAN A I, BAN O I, BOGDAN V, et al. Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing listed companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS[J]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2020,26(4): 808-836.

[6] MARSH S M, HOFFMANN M, BURGESS N D, et al. Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species[J]. Conservation Biology, 2022,36(2): e13844.

[7] BUDDHIPALA T, NUGI G. Innovative Approaches Being Trialed by the World Wide Fund For Nature (WWF) in Papua New Guinea to Enhance Access, Inclusion, And Equity in Conservation and Development Programming[J]. Social Innovations Journal, 2024,25.

[8] WIDIATEDJA I G N P. Indonesia’s Export Ban on Nickel Ore: Does It Violate the World Trade Organization (WTO) Rules?[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2021,55(4).

[9] UNEP D. Partnership and United Nations Environment Programme (2021)[J]. Reducing consumer food waste using green and digital technologies,(1-96), 2021.

[10] ESTLUND M, BROMUND T R. INTERPOL[J]. IELR, 2021,37: 135.

Downloads

Published

27-02-2025

How to Cite

Xu, K., & Chen, J. (2025). Study on the Selection of International Wildlife Trade Partners Based on TOPSIS and Spatial Statistics. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 51, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.54097/1bqa5891