Sustainable Development of Property Insurance: A Risk Assessment and Fuzzy Evaluation Approach

Hong Yang

doi:10.54097/82epqh87

Authors

Hong Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/82epqh87

Keywords:

Risk Assessment, Fuzzy Evaluation, Property Insurance.

Abstract

Sustainability and informed decision-making are vital for real estate owners and the insurance industry. To support these goals, a risk assessment model was developed using ARIMA time series analysis to predict extreme weather events and classify areas into low, medium, and high-risk categories, assisting insurers in their decisions. An AHP-GIS site selection model was also implemented, utilizing spatial analysis to recommend optimal locations for real estate developers. Additionally, a community property protection model combines entropy weighting and fuzzy evaluation to establish protection tiers, aiding community leaders in formulating effective strategies. The ARIMA model reveals that increasing extreme weather in the U.S. raises insurance claims costs, prompting insurers to adjust risk assessments and premiums. The AHP-GIS model highlights the significance of economic factors (42.063%) in site selection, indicating that incorporating extreme weather and environmental considerations can enhance real estate sustainability. Ultimately, integrating these models fosters a proactive framework for building resilient communities and securing a sustainable future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Sholoiko A. The role of the world insurance market infrastructure[J]. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2017, 3(4): 302-306.

[2] Dave M, Varshney A, Graham P. Assessing the climate change adaptability of buildings[J]. City Futures Research Centre Faculty of Built Environment, United Nations Environment Programme, UNSW, 2012.

[3] Yang Y. Risk Management in Insurance and Finance in Response to Model Uncertainty[D]. UNSW Sydney, 2024.

[4] Addoum J M, Eichholtz P, Steiner E, et al. Climate change and commercial real estate: Evidence from Hurricane Sandy[J]. Real Estate Economics, 2024, 52(3): 687-713.

[5] Wei W, Mojtahedi M, Yazdani M, et al. The alignment of Australia’s National construction code and the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction in achieving resilient buildings and communities[J]. Buildings, 2021, 11(10): 429.

[6] Bourova E, Ramsay I, Ali P. Unaffordable, untrustworthy, or unnecessary? Reasons for foregoing building, home contents, and comprehensive car insurance in disaster‐prone Australia[J]. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 2024, 27(3): 331-358.

[7] Liu H, Meng J, Li W, et al. Extreme Weather Risk Assessment and Insurance Decision Making Based on ARIMA Model and Visual Analysis[J]. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2024, 101: 305-313.

[8] Yao J, Li C, Sun K, et al. Ndc-scene: Boost monocular 3d semantic scene completion in normalized device coordinates space[C]//2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE Computer Society, 2023: 9421-9431.

[9] Yao J, Lai Y, Kou H, et al. QE-BEV: Query evolution for bird's eye view object detection in varied contexts[C]//ACM Multimedia 2024. 2024.

[10] Lv H. Evaluation Of Property Insurance Risk Caused by Disasters Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Entropy Weight Method[J]. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2024, 101: 332-339.