Research on Catastrophe Insurance Based on Multi-layer Analysis

Authors

  • Yanji Qian
  • Yifeng Hou
  • Yitao Zhu
  • Haoyu Zhang
  • Boyan Jia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/c7rmyt89

Keywords:

Analysis Hierarchy Process, Entropy Weight Method, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Prediction Model.

Abstract

In recent years, extreme weather events have occurred frequently around the world, which has caused the insurance industry to face the dual dilemma of insurance company profitability and customer affordability. Therefore, a risk assessment and management model should be developed to adapt to the current new climate reality, and a PD model should be established, combined with analytic hierarchy process and weighted average model. The combined weights of each index were calculated, and the PD risk index was obtained by using the TOPSIS evaluation method. Considering the influence of owners on insurance income, the index factor of owner's age structure α and the owner's awareness factor of prevention β are introduced to optimize the calculation formula of the loss ratio, and the solution model of catastrophe insurance income evaluation index V is obtained. According to the comparison between the evaluation area and the reference area V, the data envelopment evaluation of the 10 regions that the real estate company intends to α and β achieve is judged to determine whether the best input-output ratio is achieved. Finally, according to the optimal target value θ, 10 regions are graded, and the real estate investment policies of each level are given.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Habibi Rad M, Mojtahedi M, Ostwald M J. Industry 4.0, disaster risk management and infrastructure resilience: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis [J]. Buildings, 2021, 11 (9): 411.

[2] Gao Y, Nozick L, Kruse J, et al. Modeling competition in a market for natural catastrophe insurance [J]. Journal of Insurance Issues, 2016: 38 - 68.

[3] Gatzert N, Reichel P, Zitzmann A. Sustainability risks & opportunities in the insurance industry [J]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 2020, 109: 311 - 331.

[4] Kron W, Löw P, Kundzewicz Z W. Changes in risk of extreme weather events in Europe [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2019, 100: 74 - 83.

[5] Darko A, Chan A P C, Ameyaw E E, et al. Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction [J]. International journal of construction management, 2019, 19 (5): 436 - 452.

[6] Guan M. EERI X, Burton M. EERI H, Shokrabadi M. A database of seismic designs, nonlinear models, and seismic responses for steel moment-resisting frame buildings [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2021, 37 (2): 1199 - 1222.

[7] Yang J, Dong X, Liu S. Safety risks of primary and secondary schools in China: A systematic analysis using AHP–EWM method [J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (13): 8214.

[8] Zaman M, Ghani F, Khan A, et al. Complex Fermatean fuzzy extended TOPSIS method and its applications in decision making [J]. Heliyon, 2023.

[9] Sampath B, Sasikumar C, Myilsamy S. Application of TOPSIS Optimization Technique in the Micro-Machining Process [M]//Trends, Paradigms, and Advances in Mechatronics Engineering. IGI global, 2023: 162 - 187.

[10] Bernard C, Liu F, Vanduffel S. Optimal insurance in the presence of multiple policyholders [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2020, 180: 638 - 656.

[11] Xu T, You J, Li H, et al. Energy efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A literature review [J]. Energies, 2020, 13 (14): 3548.

Downloads

Published

27-02-2025

How to Cite

Qian, Y., Hou, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, H., & Jia, B. (2025). Research on Catastrophe Insurance Based on Multi-layer Analysis. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 51, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.54097/c7rmyt89