Low Volatility Anomaly Analysis Based on the FF-3 and CH-3 Factor Models

Authors

  • Ningyi Pan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/emha8s23

Keywords:

Low idiosyncratic volatility anomaly, CH-3 factor, EGARCH, Portfolio analysis.

Abstract

Due to its unique investor structure and institutional environment, the Chinese A-share market provides an important context for testing the applicability of classical asset pricing theories. Traditional theories suggest that "high risk corresponds to high returns," but the existence of the low-volatility anomaly (i.e., stocks with low idiosyncratic volatility generate excess returns) challenges this notion. This study aims to verify the universality of the low-volatility anomaly in the Chinese market, providing theoretical support for the improvement of localized asset pricing models and guiding investment practices. Based on the Fama-French three-factor model (FF-3) and the Chinese modified three-factor model (CH-3), this study innovatively combines the EGARCH (1,1) method to dynamically estimate expected idiosyncratic volatility (E(IVOL)) and investigates the relationship between E(IVOL) and returns through univariate and bivariate portfolio analysis. The empirical results show that: (1) there is a significant low-volatility anomaly in the Chinese market, with high E(IVOL) portfolios having lower average monthly returns than low E(IVOL) portfolios. The no-cost strategy’s excess returns are 1.24% (t = 5.240) under the FF-3 model and 2.02% (t = 7.048) under the CH-3 model; (2) the CH-3 model, by eliminating shell value interference and optimizing the value factor, captures the anomaly significantly better than the FF-3 model, highlighting the practical value of localized models. This research not only provides new evidence on the cross-country differences of the low-volatility anomaly but also offers methodological references for asset pricing and portfolio management in the Chinese market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang C S, Chen Y C, Lo H Y. A Fresh Look at the Risk-Return Tradeoff [J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2021, 68: 101546.

[2] Barroso P, Detzel A L, Maio P F. The Volatility Puzzle of the Beta Anomaly [J]. Available at SSRN, 2023.

[3] Ang A, Hodrick R, Xing Y, et al. The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns [J]. Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(1): 259-299.

[4] Chen M L, Hsu C C. The Timing of Low-Volatility Strategy [J]. Finance Research Letters, 2017, 23: 114-120.

[5] Fu F. Idiosyncratic Risk and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 91 (1): 24-37.

[6] Liu J, Stambaugh R F, Yuan Y. Size and Value in China [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 134 (1): 48-69.

[7] Xiao C, Huang W, Newton D P. Predicting Expected Idiosyncratic Volatility: Empirical Evidence from ARFIMA, HAR, and EGARCH Models [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2024, 63 (3): 979-1006.

[8] Xuechao S. Application Analysis of Securities Portfolio Statistical Technology [J]. Statistics and Application, 2024, 13 (3): 588-599.

[9] Heping X, Jingjun L, Yijun Y, et al. Does the Chinese Stock Market Have an Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle? An Empirical Analysis Based on Quantile Regression Model [J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21 (12): 17.

[10] Han, D. Network analysis of the Chinese stock market during the turbulence of 2015–2016 using log-returns, volumes and mutual information [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 523: 1091-1109.

[11] Molyboga M, L’Ahelec C. Portfolio management with drawdown-based measures [J]. SSRN, 2017.

Downloads

Published

10-05-2025

How to Cite

Pan, N. (2025). Low Volatility Anomaly Analysis Based on the FF-3 and CH-3 Factor Models. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 55, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.54097/emha8s23