A Review of Theoretical and Practical Studies on Taxation of Data Elements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/yfwadw23Keywords:
Digitalised production factors; digital tax; tax policy; Tax framework.Abstract
Along with the continuous development of the digital economy, data elements have become an important factor of production, which plays a key role in promoting economic growth, enhancing enterprise competitiveness and optimising resource allocation. The growth of economic value and commercial application of data elements has become more and more significant, which makes the issue of taxing data elements become the core focus of global fiscal policy research; however, due to the characteristics of intangible, mobile and cross-border, the traditional tax system is facing challenges. However, because of the intangible, mobile and cross-border characteristics of data, the traditional tax system is facing challenges and impacts, and how to define the property rights of data, estimate the value of data, and formulate a fair and reasonable tax policy has become a problem that needs to be solved urgently. This paper analyses the theoretical basis of data element taxation and summarizes the practical experience of major international countries through literature analysis and case study, By comparing domestic and international cases on data element taxation in recent years systematically explores the current development status of data element taxation in China and the institutional, technical and legal dilemmas faced by China, and gives countermeasures that can improve the tax system, advance the pace of system construction, promote the scientific perfection of China’s data element taxation system, and promote the formation of a healthy situation of the digital economy.
Downloads
References
[1] Fang Zhu, HE Qian, ZHAO Shen. Taxation theory progress and realization path of data elements [J]. Journal of yunnan university of finance and economics, 2025, 9 (02) : 49-62. DOI: 10.16537 / j.carol carroll nki jynufe. 001006.
[2] Jones C I, Tonetti C. Noncompetition and Data Economics [J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110 (9) : 2819-2858.
[3] Gelepithis M, Hearson M. The politics of taxing multinational firms in a digital age[J]. Journal of European Public Policy, 2022, 29(5): 708-727.
[4] Chen Yifan, FENG Zhigang, ZHANG Zhiqiang. Development trend of power data of science and technology policy and its enlightenment to our country [J]. Journal of think-tank, theory and practice, 2024, 9 (6) : 39-49. DOI: 10.19318 / j.carol carroll nki. Issn 2096-1634.2024.06.05.
[5] China Academy of Information and Communications [Z]2024-9-26
[6] Research on the value of Data and the construction of Data element market system 2024
[7] Chu Ruigang. Normative Realization of data Taxability from the perspective of structural Functionalism. Law Science,2024,(03):174-192.
[8] Wu S. A Feasibility Study on Taxation of Data[J].
[9] Li Xiaolei, Lu Anwen & Ouyang Rihui.(2024). Comparison of data element market governance models in the United States and Europe and China's Response: From the perspective of global digital economy strategy Game. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition), 36(02), 77-87.
[10] Li, H., Yu, L., & He, W. (2019). The impact of GDPR on global technology development. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(1), 1-6.
[11] Mulgund, P., Mulgund, B. P., Sharman, R., & Singh, R. (2021). The implications of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) on healthcare organizations: Lessons learned from early compliance experiences. Health Policy and Technology, 10(3), 100543.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







