Behavioural Economic Analysis of Generation Z Consumption Decision-Making in Social Media Environments

Authors

  • Jiayu Ren

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/nnb6fm05

Keywords:

Generation Z, Cognitive Bias, Anchoring Effect, Herd Behaviour, Endowment Effect.

Abstract

The present paper employs the theoretical framework of behavioural economics to systematically analyze how social media platforms reconfigure the consumption decision-making patterns of Chinese Generation Z (born in 1997-2012) through three major cognitive biases, namely the anchoring effect, the herding effect, and the endowment effect, so as to transform their demographic scale advantage into manipulative 'cognitive surpluses'. Combining cross-country case studies and empirical data, the study finds that: (1) The anchoring effect significantly increases the impulse purchase rate by combining Gen Z's cognitive vulnerability, through the use of inflated reference prices and semantic framing, significantly increasing the impulse purchase rate. Secondly, the herd effect relies on algorithmic weighted communication models (e.g., TikTok heat x interaction rate ranking), using the information cascade mechanism and the social proof heuristic to drive irrational herd consumption; (3) the endowment effect is activated by the design of virtual ownership time-limited cart activating the reconstruction of mental accounts, when combined with the cognitive resource constraints under the multitasking scenarios of Generation Z increases the conversion rate of time-limited promotions. The paper proposes a threefold policy optimization path: the establishment of a dynamic price transparency framework to eliminate anchoring bias; the implementation of algorithmic accountability to break the positive feedback in the information cocoon; and the hedging of the virtual endowment effect through the 'cooling-off period' mandatory mechanism and opportunity cost explicitness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). Main Data of the Seventh National Population Census. Retrieved May 11, 2021, from http://www.stats.gov.cn/

[2] China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). (2023). The 51st Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development. Beijing: CNNIC.

[3] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185(4157): 1124-1131.

[4] Berger J, Milkman K L. What makes online content viral. Journal of Marketing Research, 2012, 49(2): 192-205.

[5] Pariser E. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Books, 2011.

[6] Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100(5): 992-1026.

[7] United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022. New York: UN, 2022.

[8] National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2023). Statistical Communiqué on the 2022 National Economic and Social Development. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics.

[9] Tajfel H, Turner J C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin W G, Worchel S. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1979: 33-47.

[10] Aquino K, Reed A. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83(6): 1423-1440.

[11] Nunes J C, Boatwright P. Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 2004, 41(4): 457-466.

[12] Bundeskartellamt. Sector inquiry into price comparison websites. (2019) [2025-04-03]. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/

[13] Datta H, Foubert B, Van Heerde H J. The impact of "limited-time" promotions on consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 2018, 55(5): 725-738.

[14] Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. "Coherent arbitrariness": Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118(1): 73-105.

[15] Hossain T, Morgan J. ...Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non)equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2006, 6(2): 1-27.

[16] Knutson B, Rick S, Wimmer G E, et al. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 2007, 53(1): 147-156.

[17] Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner A D. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(37): 15583-15587.

[18] Van Herpen E, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M. The influence of shelf tags on consumer decision-making. Journal of Retailing, 2005, 81(4): 331-338.

[19] Sunstein C R. Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.

[20] European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2020/... on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services. (2020) [2025-04-03]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/

[21] Pew Research Center. Teens, Social Media and Technology 2023. (2023) [2025-04-03]. https://www.pewresearch.org/

[22] Scherzi v. Pacific Market International, LLC, Case 2:24-cv-02151-RAJ

[23] Mason W, Watts D J, Macready G J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability. American Journal of Sociology, 2008, 114(3): 680-724.

[24] Banerjee A V. A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107(3): 797-817.

[25] Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor S J. Social influence bias in online ratings. Management Science, 2013, 59(10): 2285-2298.

[26] Lohse G L, Rosen D L. Eye-tracking analysis of consumer attention. Journal of Consumer Research, 2017, 44(1): 1-18.

[27] Karmarkar U R, Yoon C. Consumer neuroscience: Advances in understanding consumer psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2016, 10: 160-165.

[28] Venkatraman V, Payne J W, Huettel S A. Predictors of neuroeconomic risk tolerance in adolescents. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2015, 15: 78-87.

[29] Belk R W. Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 2013, 40(3): 477-500.

[30] Li X, Li K, Chen Y. Designing decision architecture in e-commerce platforms. MIS Quarterly, 2020, 44(3): 1129-1158.

[31] Gomez-Uribe C A, Hunt N. The Netflix recommender system. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2015, 6(4): 1-19.

[32] Rader E, Gray R. Explanations as mechanisms for supporting algorithmic transparency. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2018: 1-13.

[33] Thaler R H, Sunstein C R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.

[34] Statista. E-commerce return rates by product category. (2022) [2023-03-10]. https://www.statista.com/

[35] Thaler R H. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980, 1(1): 39-60.

[36] Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(2): 443-478.

[37] Rosen L D, Carrier L M, Cheever N A. Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(3): 948-957.

[38] Hare T A, Camerer C F, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 2009, 324(5927): 646-648.

[39] European Commission. Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights. Official Journal of the European Union, 2011, L 304: 64-88.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Ren, J. (2025). Behavioural Economic Analysis of Generation Z Consumption Decision-Making in Social Media Environments. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 58, 72-78. https://doi.org/10.54097/nnb6fm05