How Psychological Biases Affect Investment Decisions: An Analysis of Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect

Kaixiang Lin

doi:10.54097/whzm4047

Authors

Kaixiang Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/whzm4047

Keywords:

Loss Aversion, Endowment Effect, Behavioral Finance, Investment Decision-Making.

Abstract

This study explores how loss aversion and the endowment effect affect investment decisions. When investors experience losses, they often continue to hold depreciating assets due to loss aversion, which ultimately reduces investment efficiency; while the endowment effect causes investors to overestimate the value of their assets, affecting reasonable transactions. This paper uses behavioral economics theory combined with case analysis to deeply explore the formation of psychological biases and their specific impact on investment decisions. Through case analysis and behavioral economics theory, this study reveals the influence mechanism of these psychological biases and proposes behavioral optimization strategies, including stop loss and portfolio diversification, to reduce the risk of irrational decisions. In addition, this study recommends that investors obtain educational resources through financial institutions to improve investors' awareness of psychological biases and improve market transaction efficiency through pricing transparency. The innovation of this study is to combine behavioral economics with actual investment cases to provide more operational optimization suggestions to promote more rational and efficient investment decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liu Li. Research on the impact of investor psychological bias on investment strategy. Financial Theory and Practice, 2019, 41 (2): 56-62.

[2] Barberis N, Huang M. Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 2001, 56 (4): 1247-1292. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00072.

[3] Rubaltelli E, Rumiati R, Slovic P. Numerical information format and investment decisions: Implications for financial planning. (2005-?) [Cited: 2025-04-04]. Available from: file:///Users/linkaixiang/Downloads/Rubaltelli-Numericalinformationformatandinvestmentdecisions-2005.pdf.

[4] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. [S.l.]: Semantics Scholar, 1979 [Citation date: 2025-04-04]. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5890/4ca9ea7f5f8f4d0258c770b92d1769130193.pdf.

[5] Jang H, Lee K. Behavioral finance: Understanding the impact of cognitive biases on investment decisions. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 2017, 22 (44): 109-122. DOI:10.1108/jefas-07-2017-0081.

[6] Scott R. Stop-loss and investment returns: A risk management perspective. Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, 2003 [Citation date: 2025-04-04]. Available from: https://www.actuaries.org.uk/system/files/documents/pdf/stop-loss-and-investment-returns.pdf.

[7] Lukić T. Behavioral aspects of investment decision making: A review of literature. Economic Horizons, 2018, 20 (2): 173-188. Available from: https://scidar.kg.ac.rs/bitstream/123456789/13329/1/1450-863X1802173L.pdf.

[8] Wei Y, Chen Z. The role of emotions in financial decision-making: A new perspective. Advances in Economics, Management, and Political Sciences, 2023, 3122. Available from: https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/aemps/article/view/3122.

[9] Kahneman D, Knetsch J L, Thaler R H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (6): 1325-1348.

[10] Gao J P. Research on pricing strategy and information disclosure strategy of e-commerce platforms under information asymmetry. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2022.