State-Level Capital Tax Progressivity and Wealth Inequality in the United States

Authors

  • Sophia Sum Wai Yan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kcvnwx30

Keywords:

Capital gains taxation; wealth inequality; tax progressivity; state tax policy; redistribution.

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between state-level capital gains tax progressivity and wealth inequality in the United States from 2000 to 2025, focusing on California, Texas, and New Hampshire. The central research question is whether progressive taxation of capital income at the state level can effectively mitigate rising income and wealth disparities. Using a panel data econometric framework with fixed-effects and difference-in-differences models, the study estimates the impact of top marginal capital gains tax rates on inequality measures such as the Gini coefficient and top income shares. The results indicate that higher capital gains taxes are associated with modest reductions in inequality and slight improvements in median net worth growth, though structural wealth concentration persists. These findings align with optimal taxation theory, suggesting that capital taxation can support redistribution without significant economic distortion. Future research should explore interactions between state and federal regimes, as well as complementary policies that expand asset ownership and strengthen fiscal capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wolff E N. Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962 to 2019: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances [J]. Review of Income and Wealth, 2021, 67(1): 191–228.

[2] Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Capital gains and the distribution of income [EB/OL]. (2021)[2025-05-19]. https://www.cbpp.org

[3] New Hampshire Department of Revenue. Interest and Dividends Tax phase-out guidance [EB/OL]. (2021)[2025-05-19]. https://www.revenue.nh.gov

[4] Kaldor N. An expenditure tax [M]. London: Allen & Unwin, 1955.

[5] Piketty T. Capital in the twenty-first century [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.

[6] Chamley C. Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives [J]. Econometrica, 1986, 54(3): 607–622.

[7] Saez E, Stantcheva S. A simpler theory of optimal capital taxation [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2018, 162: 120–142.

[8] Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Who pays? A distributional analysis of the tax systems in all 50 states [EB/OL]. (2022)[2025-05-19]. https://itep.org/whopays/

[9] Young C, Varner C, Lurie I, Prisinzano R. Millionaire migration and tax rates: Evidence from a natural experiment [J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(11): 3583–3620.

[10] Judd K L. Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect foresight model [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93(5): 847–875.

[11] Friedman M. A theory of the consumption function [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.

[12] Auerbach a J, Siegel J M. Capital gains realization and tax rates: Evidence from panel data[C]//Slemrod J. Does Atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000: 301–339.

[13] Smith M, Zidar O, Zwick E. Top wealth in America: New estimates and implications for taxation [J]. American Economic Review: Insights, 2022, 4(3): 331–346.

[14] Hall P A, Soskice D. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

[15] Campbell a L. Policy makes mass politics [J]. Annual Review of Political Science, 2012, 15: 333–351.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Wai Yan, S. S. (2025). State-Level Capital Tax Progressivity and Wealth Inequality in the United States. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 58, 357-362. https://doi.org/10.54097/kcvnwx30