Cross-Owner and Corporate Digital Technology Innovation

Kexin Pei

doi:10.54097/8p0csa32

Authors

Kexin Pei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8p0csa32

Keywords:

cross-owners, synergy effect, corporate digital technology innovation.

Abstract

In the context of the rapid development of the digital economy, corporate digital technology innovation has become a key driver for promoting high-quality economic development. We base our study on the data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 and empirically examine the impact of cross-owners on corporate digital technology innovation and its mechanism of action. We find that cross-owners have a significant positive effect on corporate digital technology innovation, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests, such as the instrumental variable method and propensity score matching. Our heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive effect of cross-owners is more pronounced in companies with a lower proportion of institutional ownership, higher audit quality, and a higher degree of separation of ownership and control. Mechanism analysis reveals that cross-owners mainly enhance the digital technology innovation capability of corporates through two pathways: improving internal control quality and curbing earnings management. Our findings are consistent with the theoretical logic that cross-owners optimize the allocation of innovation resources and mitigate agency problems through collaborative governance mechanisms. This study provides new evidence for understanding the governance effects of cross-owners and has important implications for improving corporate innovation governance mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Nambisan, et al., Digital innovation management, MIS quarterly. 41 (2017) 223-238.

[2] S. Firk, et al., Top management team characteristics and digital innovation: Exploring digital knowledge and TMT interfaces, Long Range Planning. 55 (2022) 102166.

[3] A. Hanelt, et al., Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation, European Journal of Information Systems. 30 (2021) 3-26.

[4] F. Gu, et al., Information driven or collusion: cross-ownership and the stock price crash risk, Accounting Research. 7 (2022) 141-153.

[5] C. Brooks, et al., Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions, Journal of Corporate Finance. 48 (2018) 187-216.

[6] J. He and J. K. Huang, Product Market Competition in a World of Cross-Ownership: Evidence from Institutional Blockholdings, Review of Financial Studies. 30 (2017) 2674-2718.

[7] J. Azar, et al., Anticompetitive effects of common ownership, The Journal of Finance. 73 (2018) 1513-1565.

[8] Y. Pan, et al., Cross-ownership and corporate investment efficiency: Coordination in governance or collusion in market, China Industrial Economics. 2 (2020) 136-164.

[9] X. Du, et al., Peer effect of enterprise digital transformation in the network constructed by supply chain common-ownership, China Industrial Economics. 4 (2023) 136-155.

[10] S. G. Gang, et al., Cross-ownership and Enterprise Innovation Investment, Nankai Business Review. 26 (2023) 50-62.

[11] X. Y. Jiang, et al., Stock Price Crash Risk and Corporate Innovation, Nankai Business Review. 23 (2020) 200-211.

[12] J. Zhang, et al., How does competition affect innovation: Evidence from China, China Industrial Economics. 11 (2014) 56-68.

[13] C. Yu, et al., Industrial policy and technological innovation of China’s digital economy industries, Statistical Research. 38 (2021) 51-64.

[14] S. Yong, et al., Spatial and temporal pattern of digital technology innovation and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Delta, Economic geography. 42 (2022) 124-133.

[15] H. J. R. Lott and Jr., Externalities and Corporate Objectives in a World with Diversified Shareholder/Consumers, Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis. 31 (1996) 43-68.

[16] X. H. Wu, et al., Does Common Institutional Ownership Improve the Quality of Earnings Information, Accounting Research. (2022) 56-74.

[17] J. F. Pan, et al., Besides tit for tat: The effect of US 301 tariffs on Chinese local government spending, Economics Letters. 244 (2024)

[18] M. Antón, et al., Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives, Journal of Political Economy. 131 (2023) 1294-1355.

[19] L. Lei, et al., Common institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance, Economic Research Journal. 4 (2023) 133-151.

[20] B. Zhu, et al., Multiple Blockholders and Firm Innovation, Management World. 34 (2018) 151-165.

[21] H. Q. Chen, et al., Does “Too-Connected”Network of Shareholders Exacerbate Crash Risk?——Empirical Evidence from A-Share Market, China Economic Quarterly. 23 (2023) 1070-1087.

[22] Y. Chen, et al., Institutional cross-ownership and corporate financing of investment opportunities, SSRN Electronic Journal. (2018) 1-28.

[23] J. He, et al., Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership, Journal of Financial Economics. 134 (2019) 400-418.

[24] J.-K. Kang, et al., Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors, Journal of Financial Economics. 128 (2018) 576-602.

[25] J. Park, et al., Disclosure incentives when competing firms have common ownership, Journal of Accounting and Economics. 67 (2019) 387-415.

[26] M. J. Jung, Investor overlap and diffusion of disclosure practices, Review of Accounting Studies. 18 (2013) 167-206.

[27] D. Yong, et al., Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Earnings Management, China Industrial Economics. (2021) 155-173.

[28] Y. Yoo, et al., Organizing for innovation in the digitized world, Organization science. 23 (2012) 1398-1408.

[29] Y. Liu, et al., Digital Innovation Management:Theoretical Framework and Future Research, Management World. 36 (2020) 198-217+219.

[30] F. Svahn, et al., Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms, MIS quarterly. 41 (2017) 239-254.

[31] Y. Zhang, et al., The Impact of Big Data Application on the Market Value of Chinese Enterprises: Evidence from Text Analysis of Annual Reports of Chinese Listed Companies, Economic Research Journal. 56 (2021) 42-59.

[32] Y. Q. Zhang, et al., Effects of Big Data on Firm Value in China: Evidence from Textual Analysis of Chinese Listed Firms' Annual Reports, Economic Research Journal. 56 (2021) 42-59.

[33] Y. Liu, et al., Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: An affordance perspective, Technovation. 119 (2023) 102458.

[34] X. F. Han, et al., Innovation-driven, property rights protection and “quantitative and qualitative rise” of digital technological innovation: a new perspective based on multiple policy combinations, Industrial Economics Research. (2024) 29-41+128.

[35] L. Yue, et al., Research on the Impact of Low-carbon City Pilot on Urban Digital Technology Innovation, China Industrial Economics. 42 (2023) 30-37.

[36] M. Y. Yang and Z. N. Pu, Measurement of China's Inter-provincial Digital Technology Innovation Level and Research on Regional Differences, Statistical Research. 41 (2024) 15-28.

[37] S. Tumbas, et al., Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief Digital Officer perspectives of their emerging role, Journal of Information Technology. 33 (2018) 188-202.

[38] R. Kohli and N. P. Melville, Digital innovation: A review and synthesis, Information Systems Journal. 29 (2019) 200-223.

[39] Z. X. Hu and S. Z. Ma, The Impact of Market Integration on Firm Digital Innovation: An Analysis on Digital Innovation Measurement Methods, Economic Research Journal. 58 (2023) 155-172.

[40] S. C. Liu, et al., Can Corporate Digital Transformation Promote Input-Output Efficiency, Management World. 37 (2021) 170-190+113.

[41] J. Zhang, et al., How Does Competition Affect Innovation:Evidence from China, China Industrial Economics. (2014) 56-68.

[42] F. Tao, et al., The Impact of Digital Technology Innovation on Enterprise Market Value, The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics. 40 (2023) 68-91.

[43] M. M. Cornett, et al., The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance, Journal of banking & finance. 31 (2007) 1771-1794.

[44] J. C. Hartzell and L. T. Starks, Institutional investors and executive compensation, The journal of finance. 58 (2003) 2351-2374.

[45] F. Cao, et al., Can Institutional Investor Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk, Accounting Research. (2015) 55-61+97.

[46] X. L. Chen, et al., Auditor Size, Auditor Industry Expertise and Probability of Informed Trading, Accounting Research. (2013) 69-77+95.

[47] S. Roychowdhury, et al., The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review, Journal of Accounting and Economics. 68 (2019) 101246.

[48] S. C. Myers and N. S. Majluf, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics. 13 (1984) 187-221.

[49] X. Tan, et al., The Effects of Financial Report Information Redundancy on Auditing, Auditing Research. (2022) 47-57.

[50] S. Claessens, et al., The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations, Journal of financial Economics. 58 (2000) 81-112.

[51] D. Lu, et al., Do CEO Incentives Improve the Effectiveness of Internal Control?——Empirical Evidence from Listed State-Owned Enterprises, Accounting Research. (2014) 66-72+97.

[52] R. M. Bushman and A. J. Smith, Financial accounting information and corporate governance, Journal of accounting and Economics. 32 (2001) 237-333.

[53] J. J. Jones, Earnings management during import relief investigations, Journal of accounting research. 29 (1991) 193-228.