Global Evaluation of Health and Sustainability of Pension System

Authors

  • Jiayang Feng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/gnr1k290

Keywords:

Pension system; OECD countries; Sustainability.

Abstract

Under increasing demographic pressure and fiscal stress, pension systems face growing concerns over structural level. Understanding both the drivers of pension expenditure and the structural resilience of pension institutions is crucial for informed reform. This study investigated expenditure dynamics and sustainability from 2010 to 2022 in OECD countries. Panel data regression was utilized to construct a customized OLS model: pension expenditure model, finding that GDP growth reduces pension spending, while fiscal deficits increase pension expenditure significantly. Notably, aging ratio and investment return show weak or insignificant effects, suggesting potential indirect pathways through fiscal channels. Then, a Pension System Resilience Index (PSRI) is developed by integrating five indicators: coverage rate, aging ratio, investment return. Entropy weighting and principal component analysis (PCA) are used to calculate two sets of comparable resilience scores. The results revealed strong cross-country heterogeneity among top-performing countries (e.g., Sweden, Switzerland), but substantial divergence among middle-tier systems, reflecting different structural strengths and weaknesses. The study provided an integrated evaluation framework evaluation for pension reform by combining expenditure modeling with resilience evaluation. It not only offers an integrative tool for assessing pension system health but also contributes to international policy discussions by highlighting both the fiscal pressures and institutional capacities shaping sustainable retirement systems under long-term demographic change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Rouzet Dorothée, Sánchez Ana C., Renault Thomas, Roehn Oliver. Fiscal challenges and inclusive growth in ageing societies. OECD Economic Policy Papers, 2019, (27): 1-69.

[2] Razin Assaf, Sadka Efraim, Swagel Phillip. The aging population and the size of the welfare state. Journal of Political Economy, 2002, 110(4): 900-918.

[3] Armingeon Klaus, Bonoli Giuliano. The politics of pension reform: Institutions and policy change in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 2006, 13(7): 1037-1054.

[4] Myles John, Pierson Paul. The comparative political economy of pension reform. In: The New Politics of the Welfare State, 2001: 305-333.

[5] Faghih Nasrollah, Sazegar Maryam. A taxonomy of country performance based on GDP and innovation indicators for the Group of Twenty (G20). In: Globalization and Development: Economic and Socio-Cultural Perspectives from Emerging Markets, 2019: 163-200.

[6] Zhao Wei, Chen Ning. Does old-age security promote rural residents' consumption? A decomposition based on contribution and replacement rates. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2024, 82: 817-830.

[7] Zdaniuk Bozena. Ordinary least-squares (OLS) model. In: Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 2024: 4867-4869.

[8] Kelley Pace R., LeSage James P. A spatial Hausman test. Economics Letters, 2008, 101(3): 282-284.

[9] Alami Ilias, Alves Camila, Bonizzi Bruno, et al. International financial subordination: a critical research agenda. Review of International Political Economy, 2023, 30(4): 1360-1386.

[10] Formosa Marvin. The Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing: Continental and Western Europe 20 years later. In: The United Nations Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing, 2023: 41-53.

[11] Magwape Mpho. Agenda Setting and Decision Making under the OECD/G20 IF and the WTO–Developing Countries and Reform. Intertax, 2024, 52(4).

Downloads

Published

07-07-2025

How to Cite

Feng, J. (2025). Global Evaluation of Health and Sustainability of Pension System. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 57, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.54097/gnr1k290