Research on the Sustainability of Property Insurance Based on Region Under Extreme Weather
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ahzpc302Keywords:
ALARP, MGWR Model, Climate Change, Community Development.Abstract
In the context of global climate change, the increasing frequency of extreme weather events poses significant challenges to the property insurance industry. In order to determine whether the companies should underwrite the insurance in extreme weather conditions, the paper builds the risk level evaluation model and ALARP risk assessment criterion to solve this problem. Through calculating the risk factor Ω in our model, the paper could decide whether the companies should underwrite. Then the paper chooses China and USA to conduct risk level evaluation. The paper gets the result that Ω is 0.64 in China and 1.13 in USA. The paper concluded that insurance companies will choose to underwrite policies to take the risk in many locations in China and not to do so in USA. In order to develop community building and development strategies to adapt to risks posed by climate change in specific locations, This paper builds the MGWR model in order to decide the best strategies to develop the community corresponding to the calculated loss and minimize the loss. Finally, the paper chooses Asia and North America to show our simulation results and provide strategies like “infrastructure development, emergency preparedness” to promote the community development. These results are straightforward to interpret, facilitating acceptance by decision-makers.
Downloads
References
[1] Hudson P, De Ruig L T, De Ruiter M C, et al. An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2020, 19(3): 301-321.
[2] Fraisse C W, Breuer N E, Zierden D, et al. AgClimate: A climate forecast information system for agricultural risk management in the southeastern USA[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2006, 53(1): 13-27.
[3] Mills E. A global review of insurance industry responses to climate change[J]. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 2009, 34: 323-359.
[4] Weinkle J. Experts, regulatory capture, and the “governor's dilemma”: The politics of hurricane risk science and insurance[J]. Regulation & Governance, 2020, 14(4): 637-652.
[5] Sheehan B, Mullins M, Shannon D, et al. On the benefits of insurance and disaster risk management integration for improved climate-related natural catastrophe resilience[J]. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2023, 43(4): 639-648.
[6] Wu R M X, Zhang Z, Yan W, et al. A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement[J]. PloS one, 2022, 17(1): e0262261.
[7] Maselli G, Macchiaroli M, Nesticò A. ALARP criteria to estimate acceptability and tolerability thresholds of the investment risk[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(19): 9086.
[8] Correa-Jullian C, Grimstad J, Dugan S A, et al. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Autonomous Systems Safety[J]. 2023.
[9] Zhang M, Qiao S, Yeh A G O. Disamenity effects of displaced villagers’ resettlement community on housing price in China and implication for socio-spatial segregation[J]. Applied Geography, 2022, 142: 102681.
[10] Davis C R, Berke P, Diamond Ebanks Holloman M, et al. Support strategies for socially marginalized neighborhoods likely impacted by natural hazards[J]. Coastal Resilience Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2021.
[11] Zhang X, Khaskheli M B, Shen C, et al. A comparative study of economic activity and sustainable development in China and Three South Asian Countries[J]. Discover Sustainability, 2025, 6(1): 170.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







