Comparative Analysis of Financing Channels for Property Management Companies: Taking China Merchants Property Operation & Service Co., Ltd as An Example

Yujia Xia

doi:10.54097/h6ndr502

Authors

Yujia Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/h6ndr502

Keywords:

Property Management Industry; Financing Channels; Debt Financing; Sustainable Development.

Abstract

With the development of market economy and the acceleration of China's urbanization process, the property management industry has ushered in new opportunities. With the increasing number of property management companies and fierce competition in the market, financing has become the key to enhance competitiveness. Different financing channels have different impacts on enterprises, and the choice is crucial. This paper takes China Merchants Property Operation & Service Co., Ltd as an example, deeply analyzes its basic mode and operation mode, compares the background, profile and effect of different financing channels, aims to summarize the advantages and disadvantages, provides suggestions for the future development of property companies, and explores the road of sustainable development of the property management industry in the fierce market competition. By comparing the different financing channels of Merchants Accumulator Company, whether it is debt financing or equity financing can provide great financial support for the enterprise and improve the enterprise's debt repayment and profitability, but the single traditional financing channel is accompanied by relative financing risks. Extending and expanding the single traditional financing channel or integrating debt financing and equity financing to realize the sustainable development of the property management industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xie, B. (2021). Exploration of effective financing channels for property management enterprises. China Market, 2021(33), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.13939/j.cnki.zgsc.2021.33.064

[2] Wei, B. X. (2024). Innovative strategies for property management models from the perspective of market economy. Investment and Entrepreneurship, 35(12), 143-145.

[3] Xu, L. N. (2019). A discussion on the pros and cons of different corporate financing methods. The Operator, 33(4), 128-130. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2507.2019.04.102

[4] Zhang, M. L. (2023). Analysis of pathways to broaden corporate financing channels. Brand Research, 2023(5), 161-164. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-1009.2023.05.046

[5] He, H. (2024). Construction and comparison of theoretical models for equity and debt financing in capital structure decisions. Knowledge Economy, 674(10), 43-45, 60.

[6] Yu, J. Q. (2018). Optimization of financing methods for property management companies listed on the NEEQ market: A case study of Jiabao Co., Ltd. [Master’s thesis, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics].

[7] Lee, C. C., Lee, C. C., & Xiao, S. (2021). Policy-related risk and corporate financing behavior: Evidence from China’s listed companies. Economic Modelling, 94, 539-547.

[8] Beck, T. (2006). Small and medium-sized enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2006(11), 11-13.

[9] Han, H., & Gu, X. (2021). Linkage between inclusive digital finance and high-tech enterprise innovation performance: Role of debt and equity financing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 814408.

[10] Benczúr, P., Karagiannis, S., & Kvedaras, V. (2019). Finance and economic growth: Financing structure and non-linear impact. Journal of Macroeconomics, 62, 103048.

[11] Hin, L. L. (1997). Property management in China: Opportunities and problems. Property Management, 15(1), 6-11.