An Empirical Study of ESG’s Influence on Firm Performance

Authors

  • Weichen Xi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/10mb7088

Keywords:

ESG; ROA; Enterprises; Regions; Property Rights; Market Competition.

Abstract

ESG performance is increasingly seen not only as a moral obligation but also as a key driver of business success and financial performance. This paper selects data from China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2023, uses the ESG scores of Huazheng and CNRDS to measure their ESG performance, and uses the multivariate linear regression method to empirically test the relationship and impact between ESG performance and corporate ROA performance. The test results confirm that excellent ESG performance can boost the ROA performance of enterprises. Moreover, corporate environmental responsibility (E), corporate social responsibility (S) and corporate governance (G) all have a significant promoting effect on corporate ROA performance. In addition, the ESG performance of enterprises in the mid-western regions, non-state-owned enterprises and enterprises with fierce market competition has a more significant positive impact on ROA performance. This paper enriches the existing literature in the field of ESG, and the research conclusions help provide a theoretical basis for enterprises to improve ROA by improving ESG performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hoepner, A. G., Majoch, A. A., & Zhou, X. Y. (2021). Does an asset owner’s institutional setting influence its decision to sign the principles for responsible investment? Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 389-414.

[2] Liu, Y., Ren, Y., & He, Z. (2024). Can digital transformation improve corporate ESG performance? An explanation of the mediating role of innovation capital. Systems Engineering, 1-16.

[3] Qiang, Q., Li, S., & Wang, Y. (2024). ESG performance and high-quality development of enterprises: Theoretical analysis and empirical test. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Social Science Edition), (03), 61-74.

[4] Kim, R., Kim, T., & Huh, J. (2022). Analysis of the structural relationship between ESG management, job satisfaction, and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(2), 27-47.

[5] Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607-1616.

[6] Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233.

[7] Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853-910.

[8] Wang, L., Lian, Y., & Dong, J. (2022). Research on the impact mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value. Securities Market Herald, (5), 23-34.

[9] Li, Z., & Chen, J. (2024). An empirical study on how corporate ESG performance improves labor income share: Empirical evidence based on Chinese listed companies. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics (04), 104-118.

[10] Tang, J., & Gao, Y. (2024). Measurement of high-quality economic development level and comparison of regional differences in mid-western China. Technology and Innovation Management (05), 521-531.

[11] Singh, J. N., & Chen, G. C. (2020). State-owned enterprises and the political economy of state–state relations in the developing world. In Developmental States beyond East Asia (pp. 45-65). Routledge.

[12] Fu, T., & Li, J. (2023). An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: The moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1256052.

[13] Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Research on the driving mechanism of high-quality development of enterprises: A new perspective of ESG. Journal of Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (06), 58-71.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2025

How to Cite

Xi, W. (2025). An Empirical Study of ESG’s Influence on Firm Performance. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 50, 275-284. https://doi.org/10.54097/10mb7088