Study On the Driving Mode of Production Factor Allocation on Regional Digital Transformation Under the Configuration Perspective

Jialei Li; Huiran Guo

doi:10.54097/syb66791

Authors

Jialei Li
Huiran Guo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/syb66791

Keywords:

Labour Factor Levels, Data Factor Allocation, Digital Transformation of the Region, FsQCA.

Abstract

To explore the different paths of regional digital transformation in China and understand its development mechanism, this paper employs the Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method. It examines 21 prefectural-level cities (or municipalities) with national high-tech zones in China's Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region using relevant data from 2022. The study investigates regional digital transformation from two aspects: the labour factor and the data element, based on six measures. The study finds that, firstly, none of the six single antecedents is necessary for a high level of regional digital transformation, but multi-factorial synergies can help achieve a high level of regional digital transformation. Secondly, after the group analysis, there are five configurations to achieve high-level regional digital transformation, which are divided into four paths according to the characteristics of the core variables, namely, the ‘talent development’ path, the ‘digitalisation of a diversified economic base’ path, the ‘public factor orientation’ path, and the ‘education and life integration’ path, The ‘public factor-oriented’ path and the ‘education and life integration’ path. Thirdly, the robustness of the grouping is tested by changing the consistency threshold, after which the grouping is still stable, indicating that the grouping results are reliable. Unlike existing econometric studies that focus on the impact of a single factor, this study reveals the multi-factor driving mechanism of regional digital transformation from a multi-path perspective. This paper provides new perspectives and methods for the theoretical study of regional digital transformation, as well as a more targeted theoretical basis for regional policymaking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xu Guiyang, Li Guanggui, Sun Peibo, et al. Inefficient investment and digital transformation: What is the role of financing constraints? [J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 51: 103429.Fangfang. Research on power load forecasting based on Improved BP neural network [D]. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.

[2] Zhu Xiumei, Lin Xiaoyue. Digital transformation of enterprises: research lineage sorting and integration framework construction[J]. Research and Development Management, 2022, 34(04): 141-155.

[3] Fan Xiaonan, Wang Ye, Lu Xinyuan. Digital Transformation Drives Sustainable Innovation Capability Improvement in Manufacturing Enterprises: Based on FsQCA and NCA Approaches [J]. Sustainability, 2022, 15(1): 542-542.

[4] Oberländer A.M, Röglinger M, Rosemann M. Digital opportunities for incumbents-A resource-centric perspective [J]. Strategic Information System, 2021, 30: 101670.

[5] Ling Hongcheng, Yang Zhen, Chen Jin. How Digital Inclusive Finance Enables the Digital Transformation of Enterprises[J]. Economic and Management Review, 2025, 41(01): 69-82.

[6] Shi Fu, Guo Siqi. Fair competition review, new quality productivity and digital transformation of enterprises [J]. On Economic Problems, 2025, (01): 1-14.

[7] Yao Qi, Tang Hongjuan, Liu Yunqing, et al. The penetration effect of digital leadership on digital transformation: the role of digital strategy consensus and diversity types [J]. Journal of Enterprise information management, 2023, 37(3): 903-927.

[8] Zhou Zhongsheng, Zhang Jingyao, He Chao. Manufacturing enterprise digital transformation, manager cognition, and strategic Risk-Taking—Evidence from China [J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025, 98: 103906.

[9] Li Wencong, Yang Xingquan, Yin Xingqiang. Digital transformation and labor upgrading [J]. Pacific-Basin Finance, 2024, 83: 102280.

[10] Lv Kangjuan, Zhao Ye, Zhu, Siwei, et al. Enterprise digital transformation and labor structure evolution: evidence from China [J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2024.

[11] Qin Shuyuan, Liu Ziqi, Wang Jie, et al. The impact of digital transformation on labour demand quantity and structure: Evidence from China [J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2024, 84: 1452-1469.

[12] Li Shuangyan, Chang Ge, Zunong Reyihanguli. Does regional digital economy development influence green investment? [J]. Innovation and Green Development, 2023, 2(3): 100053.

[13] Gu Limei, Li Huanhuan, Zhang Yang. Research on the challenges and optimisation path of urban digital transformation - Shanghai as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), 2022, 42(3): 41-50.

[14] Wang Dedong, Li Hui, Lu Yongqiang. Factors affecting transaction costs in megaprojects: a qualitative comparative analysis [J]. Management Projects in Business, 2021, 14(6): 1245-1269.

[15] Hu Haichen, Zhao Ruitong, Yang Meng, et al. The development path of new quality productivity in the evolution of digital-realistic fusion--an analysis based on dynamic QCA[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2024, 41(22): 37-47.

[16] Chen Lei, Ma Huijie, Zhou Yanqiu. Antecedents, model selection and promotion strategies for digital transformation in enterprises [J]. Reform, 2024, (07): 65-79.

[17] Yin Weili. Identifying the pathways through digital transformation to achieve supply chain resilience: an fsQCA approach [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 30(4): 10867-10879.

[18] Gu Runde, Li Chunfa, Yang Yangyang, et al. The impact of industrial digital transformation on green development efficiency considering the threshold effect of regional collaborative innovation: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 420: 138345.

[19] Yang Xiaoran, Ran Rong, Chen Yejing, et al. Does digital government transformation drive regional green innovation? Evidence from cities in China [J]. Energy Policy, 2024, 187: 114017.

[20] Ren Baoping,Chi Lujie. Measurement and spatial network structure analysis of digital transformation capability in Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Academia, 2024, (11): 51-66.

[21] Hu Yandi, Xu Yinda. Policy effects of public data openness on capital factor allocation - A quasi-natural experiment based on government data openness[J]. Statistics and Decision Making, 2024, 40(23): 81-85.

[22] Pappas I O. Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 58: 102310.

[23] Navarro S, Llinares C, Garzon D. Exploring the relationship between co-creation and satisfaction using QCA [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(4): 1336-1339.

[24] Zhang Changping, Chang Jiyuan, Chen Lingling, et al. Analysis of the Role Mechanism of Open Data on Regional Innovation Capability-Based on the Mediating Role of Convenience of Government Services[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2024, 44 (1): 51-60.