A study of the impact of equity incentives on corporate ESG performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/16gxvk12Keywords:
Equity Incentives, ESG Performance, Financing Capacity, Innovation Capacity.Abstract
With the concept of sustainable development taking root in people's minds, enterprises are evolving from commercial organisations to socially responsible entities. Although equity incentives have been commonly used to promote corporate business development, there is still a theoretical gap as to whether they can enhance corporate ESG performance. Based on the 2010-2022 Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share data, this study employs a two-way fixed-effects model to reveal the dual-action mechanism of equity incentives on ESG performance, as well as the mediating effect through financing ability and innovation ability. The heterogeneity test shows that equity incentives in SOEs have a more significant effect on ESG enhancement, which stems from the fact that SOEs are more likely to direct incentive resources to sustainable development due to their policy synergies and institutional norms. Mechanism analyses show that equity incentives provide financial support for ESG investment by alleviating financing constraints, but after the improvement of financing, there is a tendency for firms to tilt their resources towards short-term profit-making projects. Meanwhile, equity incentives significantly promote corporate innovation, but the competition between innovation and ESG inputs reduces the direct ESG promotion effect of equity incentives. This study fills the theoretical gap in the relationship between equity incentives and firms' ESG performance, and provides theoretical references for the sustainable development of firms and the promotion of policy improvement.
Downloads
References
[1] Michelson, G., Wailes, N., Van Der Laan, S., & Frost, G. (2004). Ethical investment processes and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 1-10.
[2] Hochberg, Y. V., & Lindsey, L. (2010). Incentives, targeting, and firm performance: An analysis of non-executive stock options. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), 4148-4186.
[3] Hall, B. J., & Murphy, K. J. (2003). The trouble with stock options. Journal of economic perspectives, 17(3), 49-70.
[4] Fan, L. F., Liao, X. & Song, Q. B..(2024). Can Horizontal Mergers and Acquisitions Improve Firms' Innovation Efficiency - A Perspective Based on Employee Incentives.Macroeconomic Research (09), 106-124.
[5] Wu, Q. S. & Shi, Q. S..(2025). Core Employee Equity Incentives and Firms' New Productivity Development.Accounting Newsletter (01), 25-30.
[6] Qinglin Li & Minxia Tian. (2021). A study of talent retention effects of equity incentives in listed forestry companies.China Forestry Economy (04), 32-35.
[7] Jing Xin. (2024). Research on the impact of executive equity incentives on corporate green technology innovation.Shanxi University of Finance and Economics.
[8] Z. J. Li, Y. Kong. (2025). Research on the influence mechanism of executive incentives on corporate ESG performance - Based on the perspective of internal control and analysts' concern [J/OL]. Finance and accounting newsletter, 1-5.
[9] Wen, Yadong & Chen, Yan. (2024). Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: effects, mechanisms, and the "greenwash" test.Statistics and Decision Making (01), 142-147.
[10] Zhang, Ruichen, Wen Lei & Zhao, Wei-Hao. 2011 A new species of the genus Pterostilbene (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Pterostilbene) from China. (2023). Can online platform interaction enhance corporate ESG performance?Financial Research (03), 67-76.
[11] Yang Qiang. (2022). Green credit and corporate ESG performance - Empirical evidence from Chinese A-share non-financial listed companies.Financial Development Review (12), 26-39. doi:10.19895/j.cnki.fdr.2022.12.004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







